| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul
''Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul'' () HCA 5 is a leading Australian case concerning unjust enrichment, and an award for restitution based on ''quantum meruit''.
==Facts==
Pavey & Matthews renovated a cottage belonging to Mrs. Paul Their contract was orally agreed, and at the end of the renovation Pavey & Mathews were paid a sum of $36,000—only a portion of what they claimed they were owed; Pavey & Matthews said the prevailing rate was $63,000, and were still owed $27,000. Because the contract was not in writing (as required by the Builders Licensing Act of 1971 (NSW )), it was considered unenforceable. Even though the contract was unenforceable, the question that the case needed to answer, was whether a quantum meruit claim could be independent of a contract and thus avoid the Licensing Act.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|